We need a 23 ppg player to combat Green's 10 ppg.

KC Connection will say PG sucks and GS in 4.

For what? So they can be stuck in basketball mediocrity the next 4 years? They'll be an 8-10 seed, miss out on a top draft pick and be stuck in purgatory.

Pacers will end up taking a Lakers package eventually if I had to guess. Lakers should offer Randle/Clarkson and the 28.

Why? He only has one year on his deal.

Because it secures the asset. Lots can happen in a year.

Randle has one year left on his deal. You aren't going to pay him if you need the cap space to sign some big time free agents. Same with Clarkson - you need the cap space.

These aren't players that are apart of the Lakers future really. I wouldn't trade Ingram, the #2, Russell or Nance, but I wouldn't hesitate to include those guys.

Cavs could have the 92 'Dream Team' and he'd still bitch if GS added one all-star.

People still mad about the Warriors stepping on the Cavs balls?

Intelligent post only problem with it is I'm a Spurs fan, not a Thunder fan. Dumb mother****er.

**** the Spurs.

GS has a one star player advantage but you'd think that would partially be offset by LeBron being the best player in the world. But I guess not.
Posted via Mobile Device

No they don't.

Draymond's 10 ppg is really an all-star advantage?

Use your trolling skills on the numbnut Bronco fans, NWO

Watching the new 30 for 30 about the rivalry history of Celtics/Lakers. Being of the age I am, I am familiar with the Magic/Bird years, but it's fascinating to watch the Auerbach years thus far.

Highly recommend.

Red lighting up a stogie right on the bench with time running down in championship after championship is the ultimate baller move.

I forgot his unbelievable 7 rpg.

What an unstoppable player.

Don't forget about his high basketball IQ.