Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9198296)

4. Stepping on one's dick is a pain, one that those few fortunate whose dicks reach the ground must bear.

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 9198393)

Yep, it's something I've learned to live with though

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9198296)

2. You and htis' being vague with the 'draft a QB already' with absolutely no mention of value or qualification wasn't my doing. I may still have a semi-functional sarcasmeter, I don't know if a 'there's a ton of assumed qualifications to my blanket hyperbolic statements you should already know'-meter has even been invented.

3. My hypothetical of a draft where Cousins was the best QB available, even early on in the draft, might be unrealistic, but it is completely defensible when someone is NEARLY SIMULTANEOUSLY stating 'draft QB, any QB, already' and 'Cousins is a guaranteed failure regardless of draft position' as Cousins, regardless of future prospects, undeniably falls under the umbrella of 'any QB.'

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9199222)

But there's at least 3, if not 5, QBs worthy of a high 1st-round grade in this draft. We're going to have a top 3 pick.

.

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9199398)

Who? Right now when guys from ESPN and the NFL network are talking to scouts it seems like there aren't any QB's with a "high" first round grade.

Sure, that will change because QB's always move up the board whether warranted or not, but I think it's a stretch to say 5 will have a top 10 grade.

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9199492)

For sure in the top 5:
Geno
Wilson

Possibly in the top 5:
Barkley
Murray

That's as far as I'm willing to go. Four ain't a bad haul if it works that way.

At the worst, you'll see probably 3 of those QBs go in the top 10, and four, five, or possibly even six QBs go in the first round.

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9198296)

1. I've heard 'such a ****ing lawyer' on here a bajillion times, one for each time the true underlying response was 'OK, I see what you're saying, good point.'

2. You and htis' being vague with the 'draft a QB already' with absolutely no mention of value or qualification wasn't my doing. I may still have a semi-functional sarcasmeter, I don't know if a 'there's a ton of assumed qualifications to my blanket hyperbolic statements you should already know'-meter has even been invented.

3. My hypothetical of a draft where Cousins was the best QB available, even early on in the draft, might be unrealistic, but it is completely defensible when someone is NEARLY SIMULTANEOUSLY stating 'draft QB, any QB, already' and 'Cousins is a guaranteed failure regardless of draft position' as Cousins, regardless of future prospects, undeniably falls under the umbrella of 'any QB.'

4. Stepping on one's dick is a pain, one that those few fortunate whose dicks reach the ground must bear.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9199542)

I think you could arguably move Barkley from the 2nd group to the 1st.

But again, the bottom line is that we're going to have a top 3 pick. We're not talking about spending our 1st-round draft pick on EJ Manuel.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9196892)

And he's still not Matt Cassel.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9196894)

Yeah, let's **** around and end up getting NOTHING at the QB position.

Just draft a ****ing QB first and let the chips fall where they may.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9196945)

Exactly.

Hey man, I know Cindy Crawford just asked me if I wanted to **** but damn, she's old, and who knows, maybe Katy Perry will walk by in 30 minutes and ask me. If I go **** Cindy Crawford, I won't be here when Katy Perry walks by. What am I going to do?!?!?!

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9200037)

I would rather get the same level of "nothing" in the 2cd than wasting our #3 overall.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9200105)

Who you gonna take at #3 then? Manti?

If you don't take a QB, you're wasting that pick because there's NOBODY worth the #3 overall pick at LT and we don't need Jarvis Jones at all.