|
|
Here is another review that talks about what was added that was not in the book itself:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...p-of-the-ring/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Alright I really have no idea what I'm talking about with kind of stuff. But is this 48 GPS something that you get used to? Because I remember watching a DVD that I've seen a million times and then watching it on a 120hz tv for the first time and wondering WTF was going on with the picture
|
It's 48 FPS. Frames per second is the number of video frames (one frame is like a still image) shown per second during the movie. Football is often broadcast at 60 FPS or 30 FPS, for example. Depends on the network.
And I'm guessing people will get used to it eventually. It's just a little jarring from what I hear. More frames is never a bad thing. |
Oops yeah I meant FPS..autocorrect on the phone
|
Quote:
|
I just got back. It was absolutely awesome. If they keep it up, the Hobbit trilogy will surpass LOTR in my opinion.
|
The 48 is definitely something people have to get used to. It did indeed make it seem like a cross between a BBC show and a high quality PS3 game. But the sharpness is unbeatable, the 3D impeccable, the contrast ratio is ridiculous, and any long shots of nature or cityscape is breathtaking. I definitely suggest seeing it in both formats (24 and then 48).
|
Took my kids tonight... this was their first exposure to JRRRRRRRR Tolkien's work. My son was blown away... my daughter was a bit creeped out... Some of those trolls, orcs and goblins... along with "Whatever the ****" Gollum is... kinda gross, but overall definitely a beautiful movie. My kids want to watch LOTR now.
|
Quote:
(in case you really wanted to know...) |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.