Your stuck with the draft class that is available unless you want to play the Hunt game of "wait another year."

I think everybody is basing this leadership question based on those comments which is extremely uninformed. I don't think any of us can pretend to know someone's leadership without being in that lockerroom.

The worse thing he said in that pressor (right after a frustrating beadown mind you) is that he felt the team gave up at times. OOOOOOh The horror. I have no problem with a QB holding guys accountable.

You want a QB who is a nice guy all the time? You have him in Matt Cassel.

Yep, what if Barkley was the only one there when we pick? Do you guys want us to take him?

Yep.

Even though I'm not a fan, I'd rather roll the dice. Some QB is better than no QB at all.

Some really good LB isn't going to do us squat. It's all about the QB.

Yes.

The only guy out of this class that I see as better than Tannehill is Geno Smith.

I'd be ok with Barkley or Wilson, but I'm sold that either have elite upside.

Geno does.

In a heartbeat

Will take, but DO NOT WANT.

Poor man's Jason Campbell. Right Black Bob???

Who? That's not what I was thinking.

I think he's more of a Cambell/McNabb/Culpepper/Russel/Smith combo though.

The Chiefs players love Romeo, too. They may love him but that doesn't make him a leader. He's not inspiring the players around him to WIN. And they've lost some games they absolutely SHOULD NOT have lost.

Dude, how do you expect to be taken seriously?

You talk about wanting leadership, leadership, and more leadership, and then you compare Wilson to JAY ****ING CUTLER? Cutler is a whiny douchebag and the last guy you want if you're gunning for a championship.

So what you are saying is that all black QBs are the same? That's not cool.

I think Barkley is headed for a Brady Quinn-like fall. If he's the only guy left when we pick, I'd be tempted to trade back.

Because the media made him out that way. Just like Wilson and that was my point. The players in Chicago respect Cutler.