ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Albert not going anywhere. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272686)

Hammock Parties 05-01-2013 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 9650351)
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Dorsey could do to please the glass half empty crowd here.

Trading down or selecting a QB would have had me cleaning jizz off my LCD.

-King- 05-01-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 9650351)
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Dorsey could do to please the glass half empty crowd here. "OMG Dorsey and his goons are trading a proven talent on the O-Line." "OMG Miami didn't bite on the trade offer and we missed out of draft prospects". OMG now we're stuck with Albert's one year deal and now he'll walk next season" "OMG now were possibly stuck with TWO quality tackles on the same line, Dorsey is ***** part 2"

Look guys, having two dominant players on the same line is a great problem to have. We haven't had this kind of talent since the days of Roaf and Shields (not saying they're that good yet). Charles and Davis are going to tear **** up this season.

He spent a first overall pick on the 3rd most important position on the line. Think about that.

O.city 05-01-2013 07:41 PM

I have 0 problems with having a bad ass OL. None whatsoever.


Hell, I like it.

I think we've gone from the worst offense in the league to actually potentially having a pretty damn good one.

However, I'm of the belief that Alex will be pretty damn good under Reid, which seemingly not many agree with. It's cool though.

RunKC 05-01-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9650367)
Trading down or selecting a QB would have had me cleaning jizz off my LCD.

So drafting Manuel at 1 would have pleased you?

ChiefRocka 05-01-2013 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 9650348)
Nah...something is up with him....or else he wouldn't be a free agent right now.

He's one of the gheys.

O.city 05-01-2013 07:42 PM

I also am starting to think, with the way the league is going in terms of passing offenses, a RT is very much imperative in todays NFL.


I wouldn't go far enough to say I'd spend a 1.1 on it, but hey, it's one less thing to worry about.

Cannibal 05-01-2013 07:45 PM

Albert to LG!

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-01-2013 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9650386)
I also am starting to think, with the way the league is going in terms of passing offenses, a RT is very much imperative in todays NFL.


I wouldn't go far enough to say I'd spend a 1.1 on it, but hey, it's one less thing to worry about.

That's a line of thought being thrown out to guards as well, given the use of multiple pass rushers in a front, stunts, and packages like Four Aces.

I don't believe it, because they don't operate in space with extremely wide splits, but it is a belief.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-01-2013 07:47 PM

The best thing to come from having a world-crushing line is that perhaps its failure against a Franchise QB might finally convince people of their pre-eminence...

Wait,

http://i41.tinypic.com/2n66pf.gif


N/m.

philfree 05-01-2013 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9650396)
Albert to LG!

Once he's signed to a long term contract it'll probably be fine with him to play anywhere he's asked to.

O.city 05-01-2013 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9650400)
That's a line of thought being thrown out to guards as well, given the use of multiple pass rushers in a front, stunts, and packages like Four Aces.

I don't believe it, because they don't operate in space with extremely wide splits, but it is a belief.

Yeah, I'm a bit split on guards. They used to be maulers etc, but with pass rushers and DL not so much just big movers now, but athletic mofos, it's tough.

Some believe a mediocre line will suffice, which in todays NFL it will, if you have a HOF'er behind it. Even the Pats with Brady, have invested in the OL. Same with the Pack, it just hasn't worked out.

But, in regards to the RT spot, most teams now have 2-3 pretty badass passrushers on both sides. The good teams or teams we need to focus on beating do.

Ming the Merciless 05-01-2013 07:49 PM

maybe in a few years we will have all 5 of our OL be top 5 picks, then maybe someday we can win

Mr. Kotter 05-01-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9650210)
That "it's a bad year" thing is just a convenient excuse for a permanent team philosophy. This franchise will never select a high round quarterback. Ever. It doesn't matter what year it is, where they pick or what's available in the draft or who the GM and coach is at the time. I's something that trickles down from the very top. Quarterback for this franchise is a complementary position, and all they have ever wanted is "good enough"....

Bet, keg....right now....Chiefs WILL draft a 1st Round QB in the next 3-4 years, if Dorsey and Reid are still around.

Loser, wears a dress for a day? :shrug:

Titty Meat 05-01-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 9650417)
maybe in a few years we will have all 5 of our OL be top 5 picks, then maybe someday we can win

Nah still need a quality fullback.

Hammock Parties 05-01-2013 07:52 PM

Imagine if we won a SB with this line.

Homers would never, ever back off the "trenches" excuse.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.