It's kinda fun being the pied piper, though.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
But thats when you risk running into none of them being available potentially. I would probably take Clowney and just hope a guy fell or try and trade back up. But thats not likely a scenario that would happen. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/nfldraftscout">nfldraftscout</a> Do not disagree one bit. Clowney would be a no-brainer. Such a dominate player.</p>— Nick Jacobs (@Jacobs71) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jacobs71/status/301905049251086336">February 14, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> ugh, this guy is on tv. |
GOD DAMMIT NICK.
|
You should known how to use "dominate" and "dominant" before proceeding in such matters.
|
Why? I mean he could just drop out hold open workouts for teams. Im sure he could make it through a tryout if hes that good.
|
@nfldraftscout Do not disagree one bit.
|
"defensive Andrew Luck"
LMAO The more I read that, the more it sounds like a really dumb thing to say about a physical freak, who plays a position where he relies almost solely on his athletic ability, and who is 20 years old. |
The Chiefs defense has got to be getting pretty ****ing good by this point. We've got all these no-brainer consensus best defensive players on the team.
Building a defense sure is hard work. All these sure things we drafted on defense and we STILL need Clowney! Gosh, I don't know how other teams without our draft resources do it! |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.