RINGLEADER |
12-25-2016 03:13 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmdrzman
(Post 12639565)
Didnt Carr put up similar numbers 2 years ago when his OL was bad and his WR's back then arent even playing in the NFL anymore?. That McGloin dude looks pretty good to me from what I've seen. And he had some bad WR's. I think he's gonna step in and keep that offense humming. People will then say that because he's doing good Carr must not be that good and it's all because of their OL etc ... that wont be true, what might be true is that both Carr and McGloin are two pretty good QB's. To be honest I'm hoping McGloin goes off.. It'll be funny that other teams get to use the Raiders to showcase McGloin, he's a UFA after this year. And I'm dead serious when I say he's a guy we should seriously look at him. Alex Smith is ass and will never take us to a SB and win it.
|
I think Carr > McGloin based on what I've seen of both but I still think Carr benefits tremendously from the line/receivers which is something that will (mostly) translate and inure to McGloin's benefit.
To your questions...
Carr in 2014: 348 of 599 (58.1%) for 3,270 yards (5.46 ypa) 21TDs 12 INTs 4 FUM - 24 sacks - 43.4 QBR - 76.6 Passer Rating
He was a rookie, of course, so he should be better, but he is considerably better with this OL and WRs - notably in the sacks and YPA stats.
McGloin in 2013: 118 of 211 (55.9%) for 1,547 yards (7.33 ypa) 8TDs 8 INTs 2 FUM - 6 sacks - 54.4 QBR - 76.1 Passer Rating
The one time the Chiefs faced McGloin as a starter in 2013 it was the Jamaal Charles 5TD game where KC scored the most points ever against a Raiders team, winning 56-31. They didn't record any sacks but had 4 INTs of McGloin (half his total for that season).
|