![]() |
China May have found sat. images on Sunday of the wreck - being released today
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...tellite-images Quote:
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_D._Button Was he really a member of the Gay Air National Guard? This article mentions a girlfriend. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1...00-pound-bombs |
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/25/us...l-anguish.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Now it seems that the plane transmitted Engine Data back to rolls Royce for ~4-5hours after the last confirmed location - perhaps traveling up to 2,200 nautical miles
it could be anywhere in this circle https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BilRYRiCYAAiRmV.jpg:large |
Fox News is reporting within the last hour that no debris was found at the location of the Chinese satellite images either.
This thing is taking an even more bizarre turn, if that was possible. |
So no debris found and it apparently flew a further 5 hrs. than previously thought....holy shit just when you believed this couldn't get any more weird...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
it makes me wonder if they could have had a situation similar to Payne Stewart where everyone lost consciousness on the plane. looking at that Circle, wouldn't the land-based radars have picked them up if they were crossing any of the land masses? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They're now saying that atleast 1 of the planes engines checked in and reported it was doing 480 knots for 4 hours after contact was lost with the Cabin and by radar. Speculation is now that it could possibly have landed in Pakistan. Fascinating mystery. Astonishing how inept Malaysia and her neighbors are. |
Quote:
Think about this, the jet I fly burns around 1350 lbs a fuel per hour per side at 3000 ft. Yet at 41000 feet we burn around 575lbs per hour per side. 2700 lbs at 3000 feet per hour 1150 lbs at 41000 feet per hour So the lower the big heavy 777 flies with 2 engines having to produce more power/thrust to push it through the air heavier denser air. It will probably burn 3 times the fuel than at cruise altitude, if not more. I don't know the burn rates of the 777, just understand air density and turbine engines fuel burn rates. Lower ='s dramatically decrease in range Higher ='s normal cruise range |
Quote:
Although, if it was flying low (CAT I/II) the fuel burn rate would be very high. Enough to burn at 4hrs at almost cruising speed? Depends on how much fuel was in that A/C. I work in the airline industry & this has people stumped big time. More & more people are slowly thinking, maybe this bird is on the ground somewhere? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.