Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 9587646)

Half Life & it's many mods
Diablo II
StarCraft
Skyrim
Civilization

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9587624)

Blizzard can blow me, they lost all of their good gaming guys and now suck. i've accepted that and moved on.

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9587624)

Blizzard can blow me, they lost all of their good gaming guys and now suck. i've accepted that and moved on.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588299)

Meh.

I'm done with them as well, technically. I'm not going to buy one of their games before its even released ever again. But I'm also not going to ignore a really good game based on the stamp in the bottom right corner on the box. I'll wait for reviews and the game to gain a little community before forking over $60 to them.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588412)

My problem with StarCraft 2 is that I basically played it with worse graphics 10 years ago and it should have been 1 game instead of 3.

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9588429)

It's a completely different game than StarCraft. It's really a pretty different game than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588470)

Different than SC? What??????

Its the same thing with prettier graphics.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588470)

HotS and WoL are different because you paid $40 for the next campaign and updates that usually come as patches.

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9588672)

Are Diablo 3 and Diablo 2 the same game? Are Skyrim and Morrowind or Oblivion the same game?



Independent of whether you pay for them or they come in patches, the changes from WoL to HotS dramatically changed the gameplay. It's not as big a difference as the change from SC:BW to SC2:WoL, but it's a pretty big difference. Not only are there new units, but many of the old units underwent fundamental attribute changes.

Originally Posted by Douchemaster General (Post 9588690)

They aren't continuations like Mass Effect, but set in the same "universe."

Main difference between Diablo 2 and Diablo 3 is that Diablo 2 was awesome, and Diable 3 was an overrated piece of shit.

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9588672)

Are Diablo 3 and Diablo 2 the same game?

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9588672)

Independent of whether you pay for them or they come in patches, the changes from WoL to HotS dramatically changed the gameplay. It's not as big a difference as the change from SC:BW to SC2:WoL, but it's a pretty big difference. Not only are there new units, but many of the old units underwent fundamental attribute changes.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588787)

LOL! No they aren't. They are similar in many ways. The one thing that separates them is that Diablo 3 is a gigantic pos that evolves around a AH and destroys everything about that genre of game.




I've watched professional players compete in HotS and guess what it was? Zergling rushes and Obelisks or w/e the **** those things are called, been a long time, vs Siege tanks and marine drops... OH THE CHANGE!

They've changed the names of some units and redesigned their looks, whooptydoo, and there were like 2 new units I can't compare to something from SC1 on Protoss. Amazing!

$40 for 20 new campaign maps. Sorry... not worth it. Should have been 1 game. But that's Activision for ya.

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9588887)

My mom thinks that all of these units look the same too. You two should lunch together.

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9588919)

Pics?

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9587621)

I was not a big fan of these games, the camera angles and such really annoyed me to no end.