ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Geno Smith fans roll call (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263890)

Reerun_KC 01-09-2013 10:44 AM

Bring on Geno Baby, His accuracy, completion % is off the charts...

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 10:44 AM

who covers the senior bowl practices and the combine?

someone had a podcast last year, i thought, that was pretty good

Brock 01-09-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9299539)
What's amazing is this team was nuts-deep in Martyball-mentality under Pissholi and passed on a guy like DeCastro and reached for a NT in Poe...

Decastro LMAO

Chiefnj2 01-09-2013 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9299543)
who covers the senior bowl practices and the combine?

someone had a podcast last year, i thought, that was pretty good

I think there may have been a sports station from Houston that had a podcast and daily updates that was pretty good. I don't remember the station.

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 10:54 AM

walterfootball has udpdated its 3 round mock today

Quote:

Kansas City Chiefs: Geno Smith, QB, West Virginia
I wrote earlier that this pick largely depended on what would happen with Scott *****. If ***** were retained, he'd draft Star Lotulelei or Luke Joeckel and then use his second-round pick on Mike Glennon, whom he likes. If ***** were fired, however, as the awesome @saveourchiefs movement was pushing for, the new general manager would almost have to take a franchise quarterback.

Well, it was the latter situation that occurred. Andy Reid was hired, while ***** was axed. New regimes mean new quarterbacks, but whether that means Reid will spend this selection on a quarterback or sign his aging, scrambling signal-caller from Philadelphia remains to be seen. But if history is any indication, Reid will use this pick on Geno Smith.

Reid eschewed all the top free-agent quarterbacks when he took over as the Eagles' head coach, taking a mobile, Big East product with a good deep ball and upside instead. Well, Smith is a mobile, (former) Big East product with a good deep ball and upside. He fits perfectly into Reid's offense.

ESPN and other outlets will tell you that Smith nor any other signal-caller is worth taking No. 1 overall, but that could easily change. Remember two years ago when ESPN was mocking Da'Quan Bowers and Nick Fairley to the Panthers? Well, Cam Newton ballooned to the top, as will some other quarterback this year. It could be Smith, Tyler Wilson, Matt Barkley or Glennon. We'll see. Four months is a long time. If this doesn't happen, the Chiefs could always trade down.
http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php

Quote:

Kansas City Chiefs: Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee
Kansas City's new quarterback will need a new receiver if Dwayne Bowe leaves. I wouldn't spend the money on Bowe; he's overrated because he's inconsistent and piles up most of his stats in garbage time. He was responsible for a ton of turnovers, including both of Matt Cassel's interceptions against the Ravens.

wow...he has glennon at 8...wilson at 38

Quote:

Buffalo Bills: Mike Glennon, QB, N.C. State
This is a reach - I had Mike Glennon in the second round a couple of updates ago - but we've seen second-day talents like Blaine Gabbert and Christian Ponder go in the top 12. Teams are so desperate for quarterbacks that they'll make moves like this.

General manager Buddy Nix, who is generally forthcoming about his offseason plans, told the media that he plans on drafting a franchise quarterback. He even said he'll trade up for one in the 2013 NFL Draft. He may have been talking about Geno Smith if the Chiefs pass on him, but he won't have to move anywhere for Glennon.

It's still early, but I believe Glennon and Tyler Wilson are the two favorites for this selection. Nix will talk himself into taking one of them. Glennon is getting the most hype right now, with Mel Kiper even saying that he could be the first quarterback off the board. I liked this pick more when Chan Gailey was still the coach, as Glennon fit perfectly into his offense.

Of course, new head coach Doug Marrone may want Ryan Nassib, but it's not uncommon for a college coach to pass on his former players. For instance, we saw this in Seattle when Pete Carroll eschewed picking Taylor Mays in favor of the superior Earl Thomas.

BWillie 01-09-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9297534)
Barkley, Smith, and Wilson will ALL be gone at #34 and it's likely Glennon will be as well.

Your entire scenario is based on something that won't happen. If we don't take a QB at #1, WE'RE NOT GETTING ONE. It's that simple. Anybody else will take will be a backup/developmental project.

Okay fine...trade down to #20 or so. Make a deal to get another mid #1 pick by trading someone accompanied by giving away some of your 4th and 5ths or something. My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 11:02 AM

walters has:

Geno #1
Glennon #8
Barkely #33
Wilson #38
Nassib #39
Jones #68
Bray #76

Rausch 01-09-2013 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9299552)
Decastro LMAO

I'm guessing that's based on his injury and lack of productivity...

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9299589)
Okay fine...trade down to #20 or so. Make a deal to get another mid #1 pick by trading someone accompanied by giving away some of your 4th and 5ths or something. My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

You have to have someone willing to pay the price to trade up to No. 1 for that to happen. Easier said than done.

Your logic (if you value 5 equally and one will be there later) isn't off, but there are some potential problems with it:

1) It assumes the Chiefs rate Smith, Barkley, Wilson, Glennon and Bray (or whomever the fifth guy is) equally. That is not necessarily the case (and I'd bet that there is separation between the top 3 and the rest of the pack by draft day).
2) It assumes you have correctly gauged the way the draft is going to go and how other teams are leaning.

Nightmare scenario would be for the Chiefs to trade down and get stuck picking from the second tier. Which is possible even at No. 20, if there are 2-3 guys that have separated themselves.

RunKC 01-09-2013 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9299586)
walterfootball has udpdated its 3 round mock today



http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php




wow...he has glennon at 8...wilson at 38

This is all because the media (ahem Kiper) is pumping up Glennon simply because he has the strongest arm and best size in the draft.

Wilson's going to beat that ass at the Senior Bowl and you will see Wilson at 8 and Glennon at 38 by next month.

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299634)
This is all because the media (ahem Kiper) is pumping up Glennon simply because he has the strongest arm and best size in the draft.

Wilson's going to beat that ass at the Senior Bowl and you will see Wilson at 8 and Glennon at 38 by next month.

i like wilson, and think it is crazy he wouldn't be a first round pick...walters is usually very pro-QB, so weird to see this list

Rausch 01-09-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9299638)
i like wilson, and think it is crazy he wouldn't be a first round pick...walters is usually very pro-QB, so weird to see this list

Despite the trend of teams trading up and reaching for QB's I think they'll fall this year.

Even after the workouts and combine.

There will be two big hits early and then everyone else will fall...

ncCHIEFfan 01-09-2013 11:13 AM

I don't understand all this talk about trading down. We won 2 games. Pick the best player at each spot. Smith/Wilson are the best players at #1.........Why do we make this difficult?

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299634)
This is all because the media (ahem Kiper) is pumping up Glennon simply because he has the strongest arm and best size in the draft.

Wilson's going to beat that ass at the Senior Bowl and you will see Wilson at 8 and Glennon at 38 by next month.

Glennon also signed with the No. 2 sports agent (David Dunn). Dunn's guys don't get as much love from the ESPN group (Kiper, McShay, Mort, Schefter) as CAA guys, but they get a hell of a lot more than Select Sports Group's clients.

Wilson and Barkley are both with CAA. Watch. They are going to get pumped like crazy as time goes on... especially by the ESPN "gurus."

htismaqe 01-09-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9299543)
who covers the senior bowl practices and the combine?

someone had a podcast last year, i thought, that was pretty good

Scott Wright will have daily breakdowns on his website. He's pretty thorough.

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9299687)
Scott Wright will have daily breakdowns on his website. He's pretty thorough.

thanks...that's the guy

htismaqe 01-09-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299478)
Matt Bowen ‏@MattBowen41
QBs at Senior Bowl will see Cover 1, Cover 3 & throw base route tree. That's it. More about technique, footwork, skill set.

This is probably the reason why Geno declined.

The questions people have with Geno are mainly his football IQ for a pro style offense since he's played in the spread for the last 2 years.

That's what the combine is for.

Some of Tyler Wilson's biggest questions are his footwork and his weird throwing motion. I bet he knew about this and wants to prove to NFL coaches that he can improve on those things.

Clearly a lot more to gain for Wilson here than Geno.

I have to be careful how much I praise Mr. Matt Bowen. He's a Hawkeye. ;)

htismaqe 01-09-2013 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9299589)
Okay fine...trade down to #20 or so. Make a deal to get another mid #1 pick by trading someone accompanied by giving away some of your 4th and 5ths or something. My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

You have to have a trade partner. There won't be one.

If we don't want a QB, nobody does.

The_Doctor10 01-09-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9299401)
ROFL

You know what the delicious irony is in calling him "checkdown"?

The word "checkdown" means to literally CHECK down. It means your first read isn't open, so you go to your outlet, thus "checking down".

So either he locks on to his primary receiver or he's "checkdown". He CAN'T be both.

I don't like people calling him a 1st read qb, simply because if you have eyes he's very clearly not. His offense has a lot of wr screens, short quick underneath stuff, rb screens, all designed to get the ball out of his hands ASAP because his line can't block for shit.

So what does he do? He executes his gameplan. He gets the wr screen out there half a second after he has the ball. He hits wrs in stride and on their proper shoulders. When time allows, he surveys the field. Given that he never runs and always has his eyes looking for someone when he has to scramble, I'm still wondering why anyone can possibly call him a 1-read qb.

suds79 01-09-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9299589)
My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

I would strongly question that evaluation then.

Historically when you look at past few drafts, there's a huge drop off between the 1st QB to the 3rd. Let alone going 5th down the list.

It's just unrealistic.

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Doctor10 (Post 9299717)
I don't like people calling him a 1st read qb, simply because if you have eyes he's very clearly not. His offense has a lot of wr screens, short quick underneath stuff, rb screens, all designed to get the ball out of his hands ASAP because his line can't block for shit.

So what does he do? He executes his gameplan. He gets the wr screen out there half a second after he has the ball. He hits wrs in stride and on their proper shoulders. When time allows, he surveys the field. Given that he never runs and always has his eyes looking for someone when he has to scramble, I'm still wondering why anyone can possibly call him a 1-read qb.

Another thing I notice... I see people talking about how he can't handle pressure. Guess those folks just haven't watched much tape of him, because that was the thing that REALLY stood out (and one of the things that sold me, other than his Sam Bradford-esque accuracy) to me. Smith is very good at sliding JUST enough in the pocket to extend a play and get the ball out.

RunKC 01-09-2013 11:35 AM

Honestly, I hope Geno rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Wilson rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Barkley rapes for the next 10 or more years.

Hell I hope Glennon does well too. Even Nassib.

Why? So all these ****ing dumbasses that keep saying this QB class sucks because they aren't last years class can be owned for years to come.

Rausch 01-09-2013 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299743)
Honestly, I hope Geno rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Wilson rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Barkley rapes for the next 10 or more years.

Hell I hope Glennon does well too. Even Nassib.

Why? So all these ****ing dumbasses that keep saying this QB class sucks because they aren't last years class can be owned for years to come.

Of all those names I'd be the least confident in Barkley...

suds79 01-09-2013 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299743)
Honestly, I hope Geno rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Wilson rapes for the next 10 or more years. I hope Barkley rapes for the next 10 or more years.

Hell I hope Glennon does well too. Even Nassib.

Why? So all these ****ing dumbasses that keep saying this QB class sucks because they aren't last years class can be owned for years to come.

You know they'll still be saying we need better O-line help to protect our current QB. "Nobody could succeed behind this line." - True fan. :p

RunKC 01-09-2013 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9299749)
Of all those names I'd be the least confident in Barkley...

It really depends. He's so similar to Andy Dalton IMO. I think if he goes to a place like Arizona and they build up an OL and offensive staff, then he could be successful.

Like Dalton, he'll need help.

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299765)
It really depends. He's so similar to Andy Dalton IMO. I think if he goes to a place like Arizona and they build up an OL and offensive staff, then he could be successful.

Like Dalton, he'll need help.

Dalton is a LOT better athlete... more nimble, better speed. Much better at moving the pocket.

I think the problem with Barkley is that he's as good now as he is ever likely to be. Which is solid, but not star-level QB play in the NFL.

Chiefnj2 01-09-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9299686)
Glennon also signed with the No. 2 sports agent (David Dunn). Dunn's guys don't get as much love from the ESPN group (Kiper, McShay, Mort, Schefter) as CAA guys, but they get a hell of a lot more than Select Sports Group's clients.

Wilson and Barkley are both with CAA. Watch. They are going to get pumped like crazy as time goes on... especially by the ESPN "gurus."

Tyler Bray signed with Tom Brady's agent and is working out with athletes performance.
Supposedly he received a 2nd round draft grade.

RunKC 01-09-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9299781)
Dalton is a LOT better athlete... more nimble, better speed. Much better at moving the pocket.

I think the problem with Barkley is that he's as good now as he is ever likely to be. Which is solid, but not star-level QB play in the NFL.

Agreed, though I think that Barkley is smarter than Dalton in some areas.

But we've seen QB's look better in good situations. Look at Cassel for proof. In New England he had help everywhere. In KC, Charles helped him so much, as did Bowe.

Stafford is a good example too. Calvin Johnson went HAM last year and caught TD's in double and even triple teams. This year CJ has a down year in the TD department and low and behold, Stafford's TD's went down as well.

milkman 01-09-2013 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9299539)
What's amazing is this team was nuts-deep in Martyball-mentality under Pissholi and passed on a guy like DeCastro and reached for a NT in Poe...

Anyone that wants to draft a guard in the top 15 is ****ing moron.

RealSNR 01-09-2013 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9299589)
Okay fine...trade down to #20 or so. Make a deal to get another mid #1 pick by trading someone accompanied by giving away some of your 4th and 5ths or something. My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

Is it dumbass day at the True Fan corral?

Whatever, I don't care. Take a balloon and gtfo, tard.

RunKC 01-09-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9299836)
Is it dumbass day at the True Fan corral?

Whatever, I don't care. Take a balloon and gtfo, tard.

It's going to be embarassing when the NFL Network shows the Chiefs draft party reaction and the true fans give us a horrible image because they will be pissed off that we selected a QB and not Joeckel. LMAO

The_Doctor10 01-09-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9299822)
Anyone that wants to draft a guard in the top 15 is ****ing moron.

They see good teams draft guards in the 20s and go to the pro bowl and think the reason is, the guard was the better player. No, the reason that guard looks all world is because Aaron Rodgers is holding the ball for 3 seconds before flicking a 40 yard dart to James jones for the major.

Meanwhile? Joe Thomas has been on a team that got double digit wins once. But keep drafting the line.

Brock 01-09-2013 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9299620)
I'm guessing that's based on his injury and lack of productivity...

It's based on that, and based on taking a guard at 11.

Sorter 01-09-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299634)
This is all because the media (ahem Kiper) is pumping up Glennon simply because he has the strongest arm and best size in the draft.

Wilson's going to beat that ass at the Senior Bowl and you will see Wilson at 8 and Glennon at 38 by next month.

His size is overrated. His neck accounts for like 6 inches. ROFL

RealSNR 01-09-2013 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9300358)
His size is overrated. His neck accounts for like 6 inches. ROFL

That's so he can eat from the tallest trees, where there is less competition among other species for food.

Not sure how it helps him be a better QB necessarily.

suds79 01-09-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9299634)
This is all because the media (ahem Kiper) is pumping up Glennon simply because he has the strongest arm and best size in the draft.

Uh Tyler Bray might have something to say about that.

Cannon for an arm.

Sorter 01-09-2013 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300405)
That's so he can eat from the tallest trees, where there is less competition among other species for food.

Not sure how it helps him be a better QB necessarily.

http://utah.todaysmama.com/files/201...es-Giraffe.jpg


GLENNON SEES EVERYTHING!

Tribal Warfare 01-09-2013 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9300414)
Uh Tyler Bray might have something to say about that.

Cannon for an arm.

This

The_Doctor10 01-09-2013 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9300414)
Uh Tyler Bray might have something to say about that.

Cannon for an arm.

Not much else about him screams 'franchise QB'.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-09-2013 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9297395)
I do. Reaching for a QB in the #1 pick in THIS draft is monumentally stupid. You wont get max value out of your pick if you just draft a QB when there are about 5 QBs who are such similar prospects when speaking about talent level and chance of success. If you can get one of those 5 QBs at #34 you do it and dont overvalue your #1 pick. Chiefs fans are so desperate to believe there is a QB that is head and shoulders ahead of everybody else and there just isnt. Unfornunately this is the worst draft in probably a decade for elite QBs. You guys have to accept that Geno Smith is not RG3 and drafting him #1 wont make him RG3 either.

Antifreeze.

Sorter 01-09-2013 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9299589)
Okay fine...trade down to #20 or so. Make a deal to get another mid #1 pick by trading someone accompanied by giving away some of your 4th and 5ths or something. My point is if you value 5 QBs equally, and one of them is still gonna be there later.....it is pointless to waste it on a QB on the very #1 pick of the draft.

As opposed to what?

A LT we don't need and is overrated? A LG? Jarvis Jones, who has some serious injury issues? Seriously, it is beyond moronic not to take Geno or Wilson with the #1 pick. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon, Nassib and Bray could all possibly go in the first round. You want to ****ing trade down and hypothetically miss out on all of them?

Chiefnj2 01-09-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9300475)
As opposed to what?

A LT we don't need and is overrated? A LG? Jarvis Jones, who has some serious injury issues? Seriously, it is beyond moronic not to take Geno or Wilson with the #1 pick. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon, Nassib and Bray could all possibly go in the first round. You want to ****ing trade down and hypothetically miss out on all of them?

Nassib is NOT going in the first.

suds79 01-09-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Doctor10 (Post 9300461)
Not much else about him screams 'franchise QB'.

To me I think he could be a fabulous prospect if he just had more time to groom & mature.

He really should have stayed another year in college but he didn't.

Size, Best arm, SEC tested... A lot to like.

But they just never pulled it together at Tenn and when I watched him I saw some pretty questionable decisions at times. Then a moment later I'd see a throw only 5-10 NFL QBs could make.

At this point kinda feel like he's a modern day Jeff George.

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 9300489)
To me I think he could be a fabulous prospect if he just had more time to groom & mature.

He really should have stayed another year in college but he didn't.

Size, Best arm, SEC tested... A lot to like.

But they just never pulled it together at Tenn and when I watched him I saw some pretty questionable decisions at times. Then a moment later I'd see a throw only 5-10 NFL QBs could make.

At this point kinda feel like he's a modern day Jeff George.

Jeff George is an excellent comparison both on and off the field.

That's not a great thing...

Sorter 01-09-2013 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9300487)
Nassib is NOT going in the first.

Really?

Why is that?

KC, Arizona, Jacksonville, Oakland, NYJ, Tampa, SD, Browns, Philly, Dallas, could all draft a QB in the first round if they felt the value was there.

KC, Zona, Jacksonville, NYJ, and Phi are probably the most likely teams to draft one. Additionally, the Bills new HC might deem Nassib worthy over Glennon, Bray, or Barkley (who would suck playing in Buffalo IMO) because you know, he like, coached him for a brief period or something like that. LMAO

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 03:21 PM

Also... regarding "Geno Smith is not RG3..."

No, he isn't. I'd actually argue that Geno is a superior passing prospect (pure passer) than RG3. Obviously, Griffin's athleticism and running ability add another dimensions that a defense must account for, which creates space in the passing game (usually by taking a back 7 defender away from the pass game).

But I wouldn't compare Geno Smith to RG3. If I was comparing him to a recent high pick, it would be Sam Bradford (But with more raw arm strength). Geno Smith's pedigree as a passer is better than RG3's.

The only thing Smith and Griffin really have in common is that they both played in Air Raid offenses (though Smith's is more of a pro-concept/traditional Air Raid and Griffin's was more spread) and they put up huge (and remarkably similar) senior seasons in the Big 12.

Oh, and their skin color.

RealSNR 01-09-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9300487)
Nassib is NOT going in the first.

"Brandon Weeden is NOT going in the first."

"Andy Dalton is NOT going in the first."

These two guys were mocked in the 3rd and 4th rounds around this time in their respective drafts.

Nassib appears to have a lot of fans in scouting circles. I absolutely expect him to break into the 1st round.

RunKC 01-09-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9300475)
As opposed to what?

A LT we don't need and is overrated? A LG? Jarvis Jones, who has some serious injury issues? Seriously, it is beyond moronic not to take Geno or Wilson with the #1 pick. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon, Nassib and Bray could all possibly go in the first round. You want to ****ing trade down and hypothetically miss out on all of them?

Luke Joeckel is going to be a top 10 LT. Give him his due credit.

And no that doesn't mean I want to draft him. Just acknowledging that he is a very good LT.

RealSNR 01-09-2013 03:30 PM

I can easily see Nassib leapfrogging Glennon as time wears on in the draft process.

Glennon's gonna ****ing drop so hard. Dude is garbage.

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300536)
"Brandon Weeden is NOT going in the first."

"Andy Dalton is NOT going in the first."

These two guys were mocked in the 3rd and 4th rounds around this time in their respective drafts.

Nassib appears to have a lot of fans in scouting circles. I absolutely expect him to break into the 1st round.

Yeah, and Nassib's college coach is an NFL coach now ... on a team that needs a QB, potentially...

RealSNR 01-09-2013 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9300538)
Luke Joeckel is going to be a top 10 LT. Give him his due credit.

And no that doesn't mean I want to draft him. Just acknowledging that he is a very good LT.

And nearly everybody (even the haters) acknowledges that Geno Smith is a top 10 QB.

The issue for those people comes when they say, "Top 10 isn't good enough for #1 overall."

If it's true for Geno, it's sure as **** true for Joeckel, who plays a position of much less importance. So the "overrated" label to Joeckel absolutely fits him to a tee.

DJ's left nut 01-09-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9300503)
Jeff George is an excellent comparison both on and off the field.

That's not a great thing...

He's Jay Cutler, IMO.

And that is a good thing.

Cutler gets a bullshit rap. The dude is tough as nails, hyper-competitive and among the top 5 arms in the game. Bray could be that guy.

But it sure is a risk to take. I'd fall over myself sprinting to the podium to grab him in the 3rd, but it just doesn't seem likely that he'll fall that far.

keg in kc 01-09-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300553)
And nearly everybody (even the haters) acknowledges that Geno Smith is a top 10 QB.

The issue for those people comes when they say, "Top 10 isn't good enough for #1 overall."

If it's true for Geno, it's sure as **** true for Joeckel, who plays a position of much less importance. So the "overrated" label to Joeckel absolutely fits him to a tee.

Yeah, but LT's have a higher positional value than QBs.

Duh!

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9300558)
He's Jay Cutler, IMO.

And that is a good thing.

Cutler gets a bullshit rap. The dude is tough as nails, hyper-competitive and among the top 5 arms in the game. Bray could be that guy.

But it sure is a risk to take. I'd fall over myself sprinting to the podium to grab him in the 3rd, but it just doesn't seem likely that he'll fall that far.

It's the tough and competitive stuff I question with Bray.

If he is willing to work hard and ends up being a tough QB, he's Cutler.

If he continues to be a whiny bitch for the rest of his career, he's George.

DJ's left nut 01-09-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9300516)
Also... regarding "Geno Smith is not RG3..."

No, he isn't. I'd actually argue that Geno is a superior passing prospect (pure passer) than RG3. Obviously, Griffin's athleticism and running ability add another dimensions that a defense must account for, which creates space in the passing game (usually by taking a back 7 defender away from the pass game).

But I wouldn't compare Geno Smith to RG3. If I was comparing him to a recent high pick, it would be Sam Bradford (But with more raw arm strength). Geno Smith's pedigree as a passer is better than RG3's.

The only thing Smith and Griffin really have in common is that they both played in Air Raid offenses (though Smith's is more of a pro-concept/traditional Air Raid and Griffin's was more spread) and they put up huge (and remarkably similar) senior seasons in the Big 12.

Oh, and their skin color.

Yup, Bradford and Smith are extremely similar prospects.

I think Bradford's accuracy was a little more consistent, but when Smith is on he's just as good. I think Bradfords footwork was a little bit better as well.

Smith's throwing motion is quicker and more precise. I like his build a little bit better and he is significantly more mobile. Where Bradford's arm strength is right around Phillip Rivers, I'd say Smith sits in the Eli Manning/Tony Romo range. Good arm, but not one that I see as elite (though I've said several times, he could prove me wrong; I just haven't seen it).

If Bradford is an 80 prospect with Luck being a 100 prospect, I'd put Geno at an 85ish. He has virtually every tool you could want but not the polish of a guy like Luck or insane athletic prowess of RGIII.

The funny thing is that if he ran a 4.4 forty, people would immediately rocket him up to 1.1...and it wouldn't make him a better QB at all.

He has to be the pick.

RunKC 01-09-2013 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300553)
And nearly everybody (even the haters) acknowledges that Geno Smith is a top 10 QB.

The issue for those people comes when they say, "Top 10 isn't good enough for #1 overall."

If it's true for Geno, it's sure as **** true for Joeckel, who plays a position of much less importance. So the "overrated" label to Joeckel absolutely fits him to a tee.

Luke Joeckel is easily a top 5 talent in the draft though. He has flat out dominated everyone he's played this year.

Not just done well. Dominated.

Watch his tape. The best defense in college (Bama), OU, LSU. None of those defenses could get pressure on Johnny Football from the left side all year long.

His positional value isn't as great as a QB, but the guy absolutely deserves the top 5 label he's getting.

WV 01-09-2013 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9300550)
Yeah, and Nassib's college coach is an NFL coach now ... on a team that needs a QB, potentially...

Yep....look for BUF to look long and hard at Nassib.

Three7s 01-09-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300553)
And nearly everybody (even the haters) acknowledges that Geno Smith is a top 10 QB.

The issue for those people comes when they say, "Top 10 isn't good enough for #1 overall."

If it's true for Geno, it's sure as **** true for Joeckel, who plays a position of much less importance. So the "overrated" label to Joeckel absolutely fits him to a tee.

A lot of the dumbasses I talk too think Geno could drop to the 2nd round. Drives me crazy.

WV 01-09-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9300585)
Luke Joeckel is easily a top 5 talent in the draft though. He has flat out dominated everyone he's played this year.

Not just done well. Dominated.

Watch his tape. The best defense in college (Bama), OU, LSU. None of those defenses could get pressure on Johnny Football from the left side all year long.

His positional value isn't as great as a QB, but the guy absolutely deserves the top 5 label he's getting.

His point is though that Geno is the number 1 QB prospect and is at least equal to or more valuable to some teams (like the Chiefs) than Joeckel yet some people refuse to see that.

RunKC 01-09-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9300594)
His point is though that Geno is the number 1 QB prospect and is at least equal to or more valuable to some teams (like the Chiefs) than Joeckel yet some people refuse to see that.

Conservative Chiefs fans are afraid that Geno would be Blackledge all over again while Joeckel is the safe pick.

They've been trained to think that for 30 years.

I feel sorry for them.

keg in kc 01-09-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9300585)
Luke Joeckel is easily a top 5 talent in the draft though. He has flat out dominated everyone he's played this year.

Not just done well. Dominated.

Watch his tape. The best defense in college (Bama), OU, LSU. None of those defenses could get pressure on Johnny Football from the left side all year long.

His positional value isn't as great as a QB, but the guy absolutely deserves the top 5 label he's getting.

I don't think anybody has said otherwise. I know what I've said is that he's not Orlando Pace. Similarly to how people are saying Geno Smith isn't RG3. He's a good prospect, but should he outstrip the top QB? Especially for a team that already has a good LT, albeit one they need to re-sign, a team that drafted a project in the 3rd round last year who has already shown some initial signs that he can play?

Joeckel shouldn't even be part of the discussion here. Although I have a great and undying fear that he'll end up being the pick anyway.

RealSNR 01-09-2013 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9300603)
I don't think anybody has said otherwise. I know what I've said is that he's not Orlando Pace. Similarly to how people are saying Geno Smith isn't RG3. He's a good prospect, but should he outstrip the top QB? Especially for a team that already has a good LT, albeit one they need to re-sign, a team that drafted a project in the 3rd round last year who has already shown some initial signs that he can play?

Joeckel shouldn't even be part of the discussion here. Although I have a great and undying fear that he'll end up being the pick anyway.

To be fair, the issue is if Joeckel is overrated or not. Not if KC should pick him. RunKC at least acknowledges that KC picking him would be a travesty.

Chiefnj2 01-09-2013 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9300587)
Yep....look for BUF to look long and hard at Nassib.

They aren't taking him in the first round. He's not a top 50 prospect.

RunKC 01-09-2013 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9300603)
I don't think anybody has said otherwise. I know what I've said is that he's not Orlando Pace. Similarly to how people are saying Geno Smith isn't RG3. He's a good prospect, but should he outstrip the top QB? Especially for a team that already has a good LT, albeit one they need to re-sign, a team that drafted a project in the 3rd round last year who has already shown some initial signs that he can play?

Joeckel shouldn't even be part of the discussion here. Although I have a great and undying fear that he'll end up being the pick anyway.

Joeckel is worth the number 1 overall pick, but he won't go 1st becuase the team picking first (us) needs a QB.

I think you could see a team like St. Louis trading up for this guy though. He is excellent value for them.

WV 01-09-2013 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9300612)
They aren't taking him in the first round. He's not a top 50 prospect.

I wouldn't think so either, but I also wouldn't be shocked to see him end up in BUF.

RunKC 01-09-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300609)
To be fair, the issue is if Joeckel is overrated or not. Not if KC should pick him. RunKC at least acknowledges that KC picking him would be a travesty.

If Reid picks him I'll be royally pissed off, like I was last April when we picked Mr. Combine wonder Dontari Poe, but if Reid gets another QB by trading back into the first/at 34 like Tyler Bray, I'll see what happens.

Reid has more knowledge about QB's than anyone here. If he does decide to take a QB after pick 1, I guess I'd roll with it, even though I'd be spewing profanities at him like no other.

RealSNR 01-09-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9300612)
They aren't taking him in the first round. He's not a top 50 prospect.

Want to make a little bet? I say Nassib gets drafted in the first round by some team.

DJ's left nut 01-09-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9300585)
Luke Joeckel is easily a top 5 talent in the draft though. He has flat out dominated everyone he's played this year.

Not just done well. Dominated.

Watch his tape. The best defense in college (Bama), OU, LSU. None of those defenses could get pressure on Johnny Football from the left side all year long.

His positional value isn't as great as a QB, but the guy absolutely deserves the top 5 label he's getting.

Joeckel is an elite pass-blocker because of his athleticism and size relative to his opponents. He's not a great run blocker, though. From what I saw, Mathews was a far superior run blocker.

In the pros, he won't have that decided edge in athleticism and every now and again he looks susceptible to power rushers.

I think he'll still be one of the best pass-blockers in the league, but if you're going to take a LT 1.1, I really think he needs to be an Orlando Pace type player; someone that absolutely dominates that side of the field (and in fact, makes that entire side of the line better). I just don't see that in Joeckel.

keg in kc 01-09-2013 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9300613)
Joeckel is worth the number 1 overall pick, but he won't go 1st becuase the team picking first (us) needs a QB.

And Smith is also worth the number 1 pick. The point being that people for some reason get hung up on not drafting him because he's not Andrew Luck, whereas it's perfectly okay for the top tackle to not be a generational type player.

We have such a tremendous, bizarre hangup on QBs here...

The folks who've been comparing him to Bradford are completely correct. And I think completely correct to say he's a better prospect. He's got prototypical measurables, was a three year starter who had an incredible amount of success, and has a few issues with mechanics and footwork, none of which are major red flags. Yet he's talked about like he's a border-line player who would be a massive reach at one. Even by "prognosticators" who say he isn't worthy of #1 then send him somewhere else in the top 10.

BigCatDaddy 01-09-2013 04:05 PM

In about 2 months the "TrueFans" will all be on the Geno band wagon once Kiper tells them he should be the number 1 pick. Damn sheep.

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300553)
And nearly everybody (even the haters) acknowledges that Geno Smith is a top 10 QB.

The issue for those people comes when they say, "Top 10 isn't good enough for #1 overall."

If it's true for Geno, it's sure as **** true for Joeckel, who plays a position of much less importance. So the "overrated" label to Joeckel absolutely fits him to a tee.

... And, KABOOM!

Perfect.

As we have said many times, it's not like there's a clear No. 1 guy that is a sure-fire impact maker that would be passed up for Geno. The opportunity cost on passing on Luke Joeckel or Jarvis Jones or (giggle) Manti Te'o (giggle) is not the same as passing on Jadaveon Clowney or Orlando Pace, etc.

Buckweath 01-09-2013 04:08 PM

I don't know why people are talking about Joeckel. If truly the Chiefs pass on a QB at #1 overall and draft that Joeckel when they could have resigned a good LT in Albert, that is some major FAIL!!

duncan_idaho 01-09-2013 05:23 PM

I'm pretty sure Kevin Harlan just suggested trading the No. 1 overall pick to Seattle for Matt Flynn and their second round pick.

:mad:

Chiefnj2 01-09-2013 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300623)
Want to make a little bet? I say Nassib gets drafted in the first round by some team.

Sure, signature for the month of May.

WV 01-09-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9300946)
I'm pretty sure Kevin Harlan just suggested trading the No. 1 overall pick to Seattle for Matt Flynn and their second round pick.

:mad:

If so he can fall into a box full of aids patients used uncapped hypodermics.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-09-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9300946)
I'm pretty sure Kevin Harlan just suggested trading the No. 1 overall pick to Seattle for Matt Flynn and their second round pick.

:mad:

What...the.....****. I like Harlan, but what a dumbass.

O.city 01-09-2013 05:30 PM

I don't get it. What makes Flynn so much better than a draft pick? He was a late round pick and had 2 good games.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-09-2013 05:39 PM

I'm done talking slapdick. The only debate should really be Geno vs. Tyler. Get Albert and Bowe signed, draft us a QB number one overall and good times at Arrowhead.

htismaqe 01-09-2013 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9300623)
Want to make a little bet? I say Nassib gets drafted in the first round by some team.

I think he'll end up at the top of the 2nd myself. Don't see him going in the first.

the Talking Can 01-09-2013 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9300999)
I'm done talking slapdick. The only debate should really be Geno vs. Tyler. Get Albert and Bowe signed, draft us a QB number one overall and good times at Arrowhead.

bingo


and why can't fans and clark understand the level of excitement a first round QB would bring to this franchise?

He would be the face of the franchise, the hope, the rallying point...it would be a blast...but idiot kc fans obsess over failure....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.