LMAO
At least the ones that wondered over here anyways. I get the impression there were some smart posters on the 9er board these clowns clashed with.

How is this relevant at all?


Three of the top four and seven of the top sixteen league leaders in takeaways didn't make the playoffs last season.

If Smith did what he did in the NO playoff game...he would be a KC legend. If half of the team didn't get injured in Indy...he would have won the first post season game since Montana.

I wonder what public opinion would be if KC had won that game.

I will say it again...there have been no QBs available since Reid took over.. that are better than Smith. People just want to bitch without realistically looking at the situation. It was a smart move on all levels. Last season was a major retooling of the roster and repairing the cap....and they paid the price. It had to be done though..

Next season is make or break for me...barring injuries, I think KC wins it's first PO game in two decades. I'm not a Smith homer...more pragmatic than that. I still would rather have him than Cutler, Dalton, Stafford, Newton, Bradford, Palmer etc....

:spock:

You don't see how an abysmal takeaway rate can (though isn't guaranteed to ) lead to fewer points?

That dropped INT was sure as shit relevant in the Raiders final drive...it's kind of amazing that KC allowed such few points but were terrible at turnovers. If that statistic changes even modestly..they are going to be a tough out.

Takeaways are largely luck. Plain and simple.

KC ranked 29th in plays per game

The pace of games last season was quick. The clock was usually ticking down.

Memphis Grizzlies scored less points a game than the Lakers. They slow the game down. It's a boring offense that fits their team and they grind out boring Wins with that style.

Why did the Oakland game come down to a dropped INT?

Surely it had absolutely nothing to do with the Chiefs first eight drives ending with punts, right?

You didn't answer the question, which isn't surprising, because the answer is so obvious. You have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

or a torrential rainstorm the rendered KC's pass rush irrelevant? Did you forget the weather that day? KC's defense blew it on that long TD run...and Smith led them back to a lead. Is it just easier to forget that he had them in position to win the game?

He was complete shit in that game. Stop lying.

Not in the second half...No QB is going to look good in that weather. The entire team was gassed and played a terrible game. That loss isn't on Smith..you want to blame a player..blame Parker.

LMAO

That's just it though, isn't it?

He plays a good first half against Indy...Chiefs lose the playoff game.

He plays a good second half against Oakland...Chiefs miss the playoffs.

He's a **** up.

Whatever you do..dont blame the defense for either of those losses..it wouldn't fit your convoluted narrative.

Sorry but it's 2015 in the NFL.

A QB should be able to put up more than 20 points against a pathetic Raiders team.

Instead he didn't because he was too busy shitting himself.

And he did the same thing next week against Arizona.

ASS11 is the reason we missed the playoffs.