Like three years of actual high level game performance isn't enough?

Yeah I suppose you're right.

There is no doubt that his game tape is the most important part of his resume. Did someone say it wasn't?

QB or Busters don't know whether to scratch their watch or wind their butt.

Geno is an absolute lock, unless he isn't which doesn't matter.

People only liked RGIII because they knew everything about him down to the contents of his daily leavings, and the only reason they aren't as high on Geno is because they haven't watched the voluminous game tapes of stellar play available to everyone with an internet connection [which prove beyond all doubt that he is a lock, unless he isn't which doesn't matter].

No QB in this class is worth the first pick in the draft, but whatever QB separates himself and is worth a top 10 pick should be number 1 on our big board.

I don't know or even want to address the first part of your statement, because the second is all that matters and I agree with it. Although if we have anybody over Geno or maybe Wilson I would question what we are looking at.

I don't know if he will pan out or not. I will say this was a bad time to be bad. This draft offers little value to the top five or six picks. With the Raiders sitting at 3 I would like to see them trade down for picks if possible. The value vs price is just not there IMO~

The value of the pick correlates with the value of the players available at that pick to the other team trading for it. Not the number of the pick. So all I'm saying is, if you want to trade down, prepare by lubing up the asshole good and proper.

There is one thing I know.

If CoMo doesn't believe that Geno Smith is worthy of the #1 overall selection, then someone should notify the Hall of Fame to start preparing Smith's bust for his induction in 20 years or so.

Most mock drafts at this time last year had Kalil going #2 overall. Luck and RGIII were always the top 2 rated QB's.

http://www.packersandfootball.com/20...-draft-30.html
http://voices.yahoo.com/updated-2012...-10135823.html
http://nflmocks.com/2011/12/31/2012-...veland-browns/
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...aft/index.html Has RGIII #2
http://nflmocks.com/2012/01/13/2012-...t-griffin-iii/
http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/01/2...for-a-lineman/
http://www.lostlettermen.com/2012-nfl-mock-draft-2-0/

7 Mocks, early January, none putting RGIII below 4th overall, all having St. Louis staying pat at #2 and with Bradford already on the roster.

I stand corrected. ;)

And were I reviewing those mocks back then, I'd say the idea of MN letting RGIII past them at #3 was insane.

Geno Smith put up big numbers in a bad conference vs several bad defenses. A lot of QB's put up huge stats in the Big XII, that's nothing new. And Geno wasn't even consistent in doing so vs some less than impressive D's certain weeks.

Yeah, you're obviously a lawyer.

You guys need to stop thinking about the fact that we have the overall #1 pick. Our overall #1 need is QB, so thats what we need to draft.

I dont give a shit if he's rated the 17th best player on the board. We take him #1.

I can't wait to call out all the people that hated Geno this year, and are buying his jersey next year.

Exactly how BUSTS happen. :shake:
Put me # 1 on yout "Call Out" list.